head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Scweet
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Scweet has 1,659 stars, 286 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 7,132% (119,977 vs 1,659 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Scweet is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Scweet 17%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Scweet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 286 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scweet if
- You want the Scweet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Scweet fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Scweet
Scrape Twitter / X without the official API. Tweets, profiles, followers, trends and more. Two ways to run it 1. Hosted : nothing to manage ⭐ Runs on Apify. You do not need X accounts, cookies or proxies. Configure and run from your browser , no code needed, or drive it from code with the Python API Search tweets, profile timelines, follower / following lists Export in different formats ( JSON, CSV or XLSX ) Free tier included ; pay as you go pricing is on the Actor page 2. Self hosted : full control Bring your own X accounts and proxies. Run it from Python or the CLI, inside your own infrastructure. Both give…
read the full Scweet overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Scweet more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and Scweet has 1,659. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Scweet free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and Scweet under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Scweet?
Browser Use is written in Python and Scweet in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Scweet?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Scweet if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.