head to head · open source
Browser Use vs scrapecraft
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. scrapecraft has 725 stars, 116 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 16,449% (119,977 vs 725 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; scrapecraft is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, scrapecraft 16%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | scrapecraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 725 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick scrapecraft if
- You want the scrapecraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and scrapecraft fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About scrapecraft
ScrapeCraft AI Powered Web Scraping Editor ScrapeCraft is a web based scraping editor similar to Cursor but specialized for web scraping. It uses AI assistance to help users build scraping pipelines with the ScrapeGraphAI API. Features 🤖 AI powered assistant using OpenRouter (Kimi k2 model) 🔗 Multi URL bulk scraping support 📋 Dynamic schema definition with Pydantic 💻 Python code generation with async support 🚀 Real time WebSocket streaming 📊 Results visualization (table & JSON views) 🔄 Auto updating deployment with Watchtower Tech Stack Backend : FastAPI, LangGraph, ScrapeGraphAI Frontend : React…
read the full scrapecraft overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or scrapecraft more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and scrapecraft has 725. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and scrapecraft free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and scrapecraft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and scrapecraft?
Browser Use is written in Python and scrapecraft in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or scrapecraft?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose scrapecraft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.