head to head · open source
Browser Use vs rebrowser-patches
Browser Use has 118,573 GitHub stars, 13,159 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. rebrowser-patches has 1,443 stars, 85 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 8,117% (118,573 vs 1,443 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; rebrowser-patches is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, rebrowser-patches 6%. rebrowser-patches was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | rebrowser-patches | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 119K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-17 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rebrowser-patches if
- You want the rebrowser-patches feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and rebrowser-patches fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About rebrowser-patches
🪄 Patches for undetectable browser automation This repo contains patches to enhance popular web automation libraries. Specifically, it targets the puppeteer and playwright packages. Some aspects of automation libraries or browser behavior cannot be adjusted through settings or command line switches. Therefore, we fix these issues by patching the library's source code. While this approach is fragile and may break as the libraries' source code changes over time, the goal is to maintain this repo with community help to keep the patches up to date. Do I really need any patches? Out of the box Puppeteer and…
read the full rebrowser-patches overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or rebrowser-patches more popular?
Browser Use has 118,573 GitHub stars and rebrowser-patches has 1,443. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and rebrowser-patches free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and rebrowser-patches under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and rebrowser-patches?
Browser Use is written in Python and rebrowser-patches in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or rebrowser-patches?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (118,573 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rebrowser-patches if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.