head to head · open source
Browser Use vs playwright-go
Browser Use has 120,280 GitHub stars, 13,426 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. playwright-go has 3,539 stars, 250 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 3,299% (120,280 vs 3,539 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; playwright-go is written in Go under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, playwright-go 7%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | playwright-go | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-11-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 250 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick playwright-go if
- You want the playwright-go feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and playwright-go fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About playwright-go
🎭 Playwright for Website API reference Example recipes Playwright is a Go library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API. Playwright is built to enable cross browser web automation that is ever green , capable , reliable and fast . Headless and headed execution is supported for all the browsers on all platforms. Installation Install the Playwright driver and browsers (add with deps to also install the OS dependencies). Note that you should replace the version number 0.xxxx.x with the version used in your current go.mod . Each minor version upgrade requires a specific Playwright driver…
read the full playwright-go overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or playwright-go more popular?
Browser Use has 120,280 GitHub stars and playwright-go has 3,539. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and playwright-go free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and playwright-go under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and playwright-go?
Browser Use is written in Python and playwright-go in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or playwright-go?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,280 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose playwright-go if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.