head to head · open source

Browser Use vs patchright-nodejs

Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars, 13,383 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. patchright-nodejs has 804 stars, 48 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 14,829% (120,031 vs 804 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; patchright-nodejs is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, patchright-nodejs 6%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Browser Use ★ 120K patchright-nodejs ★ 804 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Browser Use patchright-nodejs
GitHub stars ★ 120K ★ 804
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-20
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 48
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Browser Use if

  • You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Browser Use profile →

pick patchright-nodejs if

  • You want the patchright-nodejs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and patchright-nodejs fits your workflow better

full patchright-nodejs profile →

About Browser Use

Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…

read the full Browser Use overview →

About patchright-nodejs

🎭 Patchright NodeJS Patchright is a patched and undetected version of the Playwright Testing and Automation Framework. It can be used as a drop in replacement for Playwright. [!NOTE] This repository serves the Patchright NodeJS Package. To use Patchright with Python, check out the Python Package. Also check out the main Patchright Driver Repository Sponsors Want to Sponsor this Project? Contact @vinyzu on Discord! NodeMaven: Your efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with High Quality IPs. Why NodeMaven? 🎯 ZIP targeting ✅ 99.9% Uptime 🔍 IP Filtering: Proxies are guaranteed to have fraud…

read the full patchright-nodejs overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use or patchright-nodejs more popular?

Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars and patchright-nodejs has 804. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.

Are Browser Use and patchright-nodejs free?

Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and patchright-nodejs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Browser Use and patchright-nodejs?

Browser Use is written in Python and patchright-nodejs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Browser Use or patchright-nodejs?

Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose patchright-nodejs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.