head to head · open source
Browser Use vs OpenMQTTGateway
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenMQTTGateway has 4,116 stars, 908 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 2,812% (119,857 vs 4,116 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; OpenMQTTGateway is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenMQTTGateway 22%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | OpenMQTTGateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 908 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenMQTTGateway if
- You want the OpenMQTTGateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and OpenMQTTGateway fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About OpenMQTTGateway
OpenMQTTGateway aims to unify various technologies and protocols into a single firmware. This reduces the need for multiple physical bridges and streamlines diverse technologies under the widely used MQTT protocol. Sponsors Documentation The documentation is here New to OpenMQTTGateway? Follow the Getting Started guide to flash a board from your browser and see your first sensor data in about 15 minutes. The reference sheet, with the list of all functions, pinouts is here Upload Upload OpenMQTTGateway directly from the upload page (no additional software required) or build your own configuration with PlatformIO…
read the full OpenMQTTGateway overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or OpenMQTTGateway more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and OpenMQTTGateway has 4,116. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and OpenMQTTGateway free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and OpenMQTTGateway under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and OpenMQTTGateway?
Browser Use is written in Python and OpenMQTTGateway in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or OpenMQTTGateway?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenMQTTGateway if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.