head to head · open source
Browser Use vs OpenBot
Browser Use has 120,153 GitHub stars, 13,406 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped today. OpenBot has 10,271 stars, 1,274 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped today. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,070% (120,153 vs 10,271 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; OpenBot is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenBot 12%. OpenBot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | OpenBot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 10K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenBot if
- You want the OpenBot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and OpenBot fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About OpenBot
OpenBot The AI assistant your company can actually own. Same shape as ChatGPT, Claude or Grok, with one difference that matters: it runs on your infrastructure and you can change anything about it. Any agent stack, through AG UI. Each coworker gets a computer of its own: a real browser with its own logins, its own files, and only the tools you grant. Every action decided before it happens and recorded after. Talk to an engineer · Have us build it with you · copilotkit.ai/openbot · Quick start · Docs Bring any AG UI agent, written on a framework or by hand, and it arrives as a coworker with a channel of its own…
read the full OpenBot overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or OpenBot more popular?
Browser Use has 120,153 GitHub stars and OpenBot has 10,271. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and OpenBot free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and OpenBot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and OpenBot?
Browser Use is written in Python and OpenBot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or OpenBot?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,153 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenBot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.