head to head · open source
Browser Use vs open-dots
Browser Use has 121,050 GitHub stars, 13,537 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped today. open-dots has 7,074 stars, 920 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,611% (121,050 vs 7,074 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; open-dots is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, open-dots 13%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (computer-use), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | open-dots | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 121K | ★ 7.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-15 | 2026-11-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 920 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 121K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-dots if
- You want the open-dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and open-dots fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About open-dots
Open Dots: Open Source Alternative to OpenAI Dots ▶ Watch: OpenAI Dots Alternative: Free, Open Source & Any Model Open Dots is an open source alternative to OpenAI Dots: a self hosted AI workspace for chat, tool use, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks. It brings model conversations, a governed action gateway, approval prompts, and an optional isolated browser runtime into one local first app. Open Dots is independently built and is not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI, xAI, or any model provider. It offers a self hostable, inspectable alternative for people looking for an open source OpenAI Dots…
read the full open-dots overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or open-dots more popular?
Browser Use has 121,050 GitHub stars and open-dots has 7,074. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and open-dots free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and open-dots under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and open-dots?
Browser Use is written in Python and open-dots in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or open-dots?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (121,050 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-dots if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.