head to head · open source
Browser Use vs open-claude-cowork
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-claude-cowork has 4,307 stars, 702 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 2,683% (119,857 vs 4,307 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; open-claude-cowork is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, open-claude-cowork 16%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | open-claude-cowork | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 4.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 702 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-claude-cowork if
- You want the open-claude-cowork feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and open-claude-cowork fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About open-claude-cowork
Open Claude Cowork An open source desktop chat application powered by Claude Agent SDK and Composio Tool Router. Automate your work end to end across desktop and all your work apps in one place. Get your free API key to get started → Pst. hey, you, join our stargazers :) What's Inside This repo includes two powerful AI tools: Both include 500+ app integrations via Composio (Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, and more). Quick Start Open Claude Cowork Then run in two terminals: 🦑 Secure Clawdbot Select "Terminal chat" to test, or "Start gateway" to connect WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal/iMessage. See Secure Clawdbot…
read the full open-claude-cowork overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or open-claude-cowork more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and open-claude-cowork has 4,307. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and open-claude-cowork free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and open-claude-cowork under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and open-claude-cowork?
Browser Use is written in Python and open-claude-cowork in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or open-claude-cowork?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-claude-cowork if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.