head to head · open source
Browser Use vs ODS
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ODS has 7,745 stars, 1,102 forks, 2,618 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,448% (119,857 vs 7,745 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; ODS is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ODS 14%. ODS was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | ODS | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 7.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ODS if
- You want the ODS feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and ODS fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About ODS
ODS Osmantic Deployment System Turn your PC, Mac, or Linux box into a private AI server. AI server and homelab setup is rapidly becoming a solved problem. It should feel that way for everyone. ODS installs and wires together everything you need to run AI locally, so you do not have to assemble Ollama, Open WebUI, n8n, ComfyUI, and privacy tools by hand: Local model inference — run open models on your own hardware ChatGPT style web UI — talk to your models from any browser Control dashboard — manage models, services, setup, GPU status, and extensions from one place Voice, agents, and workflows — build automations…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or ODS more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and ODS has 7,745. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and ODS free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and ODS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and ODS?
Browser Use is written in Python and ODS in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or ODS?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ODS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.