head to head · open source
Browser Use vs oc
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. oc has 549 stars, 33 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 21,754% (119,977 vs 549 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; oc is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, oc 6%. oc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | oc | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 549 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 33 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oc if
- You want the oc feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and oc fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About oc
only cli Turns websites into a command line interface for AI agents. oc open fetches a page and hands back a compact, numbered view instead of raw HTML or a screenshot, so agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity can browse without burning tokens. It also gets past blocks that stop naive fetchers on some sites, by talking to the page the way a real browser would. A typical page is tens of thousands of tokens of markup; the view above fits in a few hundred. No per site adapters required, no browser extension, no daemon. If you are an LLM reading this repository, llms.txt is the short version. Install…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or oc more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and oc has 549. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and oc free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and oc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and oc?
Browser Use is written in Python and oc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or oc?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.