head to head · open source
Browser Use vs node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket has 603 stars, 128 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 19,777% (119,857 vs 603 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket 21%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 603 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 128 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket if
- You want the node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket
node red contrib home assistant websocket [![Release Version][release shield]][release link] [![Build Status][buildstatus shield]][buildstatus link] [![License][license shield]](LICENSE.md) [![BuyMeCoffee][buymecoffee shield]][buymecoffee link] Various nodes to assist in setting up automation using Node RED communicating with Home Assistant. Getting Started Documentation can be found here. Prerequisites Have Node RED installed and working, if you need to install Node RED see here. Node.js v20+ Node RED v3.1.1+ Home Assistant v2024.3+ Installation Install via Node RED Manage Palette Install via npm For Home…
read the full node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket has 603. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket?
Browser Use is written in Python and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.