head to head · open source
Browser Use vs NewPipeExtractor
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NewPipeExtractor has 2,037 stars, 627 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 5,790% (119,977 vs 2,037 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; NewPipeExtractor is written in Java under GPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, NewPipeExtractor 31%. NewPipeExtractor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | NewPipeExtractor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 627 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NewPipeExtractor if
- You want the NewPipeExtractor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and NewPipeExtractor fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About NewPipeExtractor
NewPipe Extractor JDoc • Documentation NewPipe Extractor is a library for extracting things from streaming sites. It is a core component of NewPipe, but could be used independently. Usage NewPipe Extractor is available at JitPack's Maven repo. If you're using Gradle, you could add NewPipe Extractor as a dependency with the following steps: 1. Add maven { url ' } to the repositories in your build.gradle . 2. Add implementation 'com.github.teamnewpipe:NewPipeExtractor:INSERT VERSION HERE' to the dependencies in your build.gradle . Replace INSERT VERSION HERE with the latest release. 3. If you are using tools to…
read the full NewPipeExtractor overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or NewPipeExtractor more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and NewPipeExtractor has 2,037. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and NewPipeExtractor free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and NewPipeExtractor under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and NewPipeExtractor?
Browser Use is written in Python and NewPipeExtractor in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or NewPipeExtractor?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NewPipeExtractor if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.