head to head · open source
Browser Use vs n8n-helm-chart
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. n8n-helm-chart has 709 stars, 246 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 16,805% (119,857 vs 709 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; n8n-helm-chart is written in Go Template under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, n8n-helm-chart 35%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | n8n-helm-chart | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 709 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go Template |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 246 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick n8n-helm-chart if
- You want the n8n-helm-chart feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go Template
- You evaluated both and n8n-helm-chart fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About n8n-helm-chart
[!NOTE] The n8n Helm chart is growing in popularity. We're looking for additional conscientious and accurate maintainers and contributors to improve and maintain this chart, governance, development, documentation and CI/CD workflows. If you're interested in making a difference, join the discussion. n8n Helm Chart for Kubernetes n8n is an extendable workflow automation tool. The Helm chart source code location is github.com/8gears/n8n helm chart Requirements Before you start, make sure you have the following tools ready: Helm = 3.8 external Postgres DB or embedded SQLite (SQLite is bundled with n8n) Helmfile…
read the full n8n-helm-chart overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or n8n-helm-chart more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and n8n-helm-chart has 709. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and n8n-helm-chart free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and n8n-helm-chart under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and n8n-helm-chart?
Browser Use is written in Python and n8n-helm-chart in Go Template. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or n8n-helm-chart?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose n8n-helm-chart if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.