head to head · open source
Browser Use vs MDMA
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. MDMA has 73 stars, 2 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 164,088% (119,857 vs 73 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; MDMA is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, MDMA 3%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, llm, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | MDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 73 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 2 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick MDMA if
- You want the MDMA feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and MDMA fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About MDMA
MDMA Markdown Document with Mounted Applications Interactive documents from Markdown. Built for next gen apps 🌐 Website · 🚀 Live Demo · 📖 Docs · 💬 Discord · 🤗 Model Why MDMA? AI conversations today are plain text — the user reads a response and manually acts on it. MDMA changes that. When an LLM knows the MDMA spec, it can respond with interactive components (forms, tables, approval gates) instead of just text. The conversation becomes actionable: the user fills out a form, approves a step, or reviews structured data — all inline, with a predictable schema that your app already knows how to render and…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or MDMA more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and MDMA has 73. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and MDMA free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and MDMA under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and MDMA?
Browser Use is written in Python and MDMA in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or MDMA?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MDMA if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.