head to head · open source
Browser Use vs magic
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars, 12,661 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. magic has 1,193 stars, 175 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 9,541% (115,022 vs 1,193 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; magic is written in C# under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | magic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 115K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 175 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 115K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic if
- You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.
read the full Browser Use overview →
About magic
Instant SECURE Full Stack Apps and AI Agents Turn plain English into a working full stack app — database, secure API, business logic, and frontend — running on your own hardware , with zero lock in . An open source alternative to Lovable, Bolt, and Replit that gives you the whole backend, plus an MCP server that turns every endpoint into a tool for Claude, Cursor, or Codex. Read more about Hyperlambda. [ ] Run it in 60 seconds Then open localhost:5555 , point it at localhost:4444 , and log in with root / root . Point the API Wizard at your database, and it generates a complete, secured REST API — then extend it i…
read the full magic overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or magic more popular?
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars and magic has 1,193. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and magic free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and magic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and magic?
Browser Use is written in Python and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or magic?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (115,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.