head to head · open source
Browser Use vs jshookmcp
Browser Use has 120,967 GitHub stars, 13,529 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped today. jshookmcp has 2,113 stars, 465 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. Browser Use leads on adoption by 5,625% (120,967 vs 2,113 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; jshookmcp is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, jshookmcp 22%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation, llm, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | jshookmcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 121K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 465 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 121K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jshookmcp if
- You want the jshookmcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jshookmcp fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About jshookmcp
@jshookmcp/jshook A search first, profile aware reverse engineering workspace for AI agents. Hook the page, capture the network, deobfuscate the bundle, disassemble the WASM, instrument the process — and let one MCP server keep the whole attack surface in reach without drowning the model in schemas. English · 中文 What's different · Capabilities · Use cases · Highlights · Transport · Registry · Architecture · Build Documentation · Getting Started · Configuration · Tool Reference Sponsored by Swiftproxy — Premium Residential Proxies for Web Automation · 10% off code: PROXY90 What makes jshook different Most MCP…
read the full jshookmcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or jshookmcp more popular?
Browser Use has 120,967 GitHub stars and jshookmcp has 2,113. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and jshookmcp free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and jshookmcp under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and jshookmcp?
Browser Use is written in Python and jshookmcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or jshookmcp?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,967 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose jshookmcp if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.