head to head · open source
Browser Use vs invisible_playwright
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. invisible_playwright has 2,549 stars, 276 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 4,602% (119,857 vs 2,549 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; invisible_playwright is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, invisible_playwright 11%. invisible_playwright was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, headless-browser, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | invisible_playwright | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 276 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick invisible_playwright if
- You want the invisible_playwright feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and invisible_playwright fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About invisible_playwright
Free antidetect browser stealth for Playwright: undetected Firefox fingerprint, headless or headed. Python web scraping and captcha bypass. Open source, and it passes every bot detection test. How it works Anti bots ask two questions, and reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha and Cloudflare Turnstile score the answers. invisible playwright answers yes to both. 1. Is this a real browser? Yes. It is Firefox, patched at the C++ source level. The browser fingerprint is set inside the engine, not injected into the page: navigator, screen, GPU/WebGL, canvas, fonts, audio, WebRTC, timezone, network. Headless or headed, the same values…
read the full invisible_playwright overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or invisible_playwright more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and invisible_playwright has 2,549. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and invisible_playwright free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and invisible_playwright under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and invisible_playwright?
Browser Use is written in Python and invisible_playwright in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or invisible_playwright?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose invisible_playwright if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.