head to head · open source
Browser Use vs httpcloak
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. httpcloak has 1,358 stars, 97 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 8,735% (119,977 vs 1,358 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; httpcloak is written in Go under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, httpcloak 7%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | httpcloak | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick httpcloak if
- You want the httpcloak feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and httpcloak fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About httpcloak
Every Byte of your Request Indistinguishable from Chrome. 📖 Full documentation at httpcloak.dev The Problem Bot detection doesn't just check your User Agent anymore. It fingerprints your TLS handshake . Your HTTP/2 frames . Your QUIC parameters . The order of your headers. Whether your SNI is encrypted. One mismatch = blocked. The Solution That's it. Full browser transport layer fingerprint. What Gets Emulated 🔐 TLS Layer JA3 / JA4 fingerprints GREASE randomization Post quantum X25519MLKEM768 ECH (Encrypted Client Hello) 🚀 Transport Layer HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames WINDOW UPDATE values Stream priorities (HPACK)…
read the full httpcloak overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or httpcloak more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and httpcloak has 1,358. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and httpcloak free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and httpcloak under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and httpcloak?
Browser Use is written in Python and httpcloak in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or httpcloak?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose httpcloak if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.