head to head · open source
Browser Use vs HolyClaude
Browser Use has 120,153 GitHub stars, 13,406 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HolyClaude has 2,614 stars, 273 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 4,497% (120,153 vs 2,614 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; HolyClaude is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, HolyClaude 10%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | HolyClaude | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 273 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HolyClaude if
- You want the HolyClaude feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and HolyClaude fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About HolyClaude
🌍 English Español Français Italiano Português Deutsch Русский हिन्दी 中文 日本語 한국어 HolyClaude Stop configuring. Start building. One command. Full AI development workstation. Claude Code, web UI, headless browser, 8 AI CLIs, 50+ dev tools — containerized and ready. You were going to spend 2 hours setting this up manually. Or you could just docker compose up . Works with your existing Claude Code subscription. Max/Pro plan, API key — whatever you have, it just works. [!TIP] Stop maintaining. Start building. A hosted AI workstation. Always on Linux box. holycode.cloud What is this? You know the drill. You want Claude…
read the full HolyClaude overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or HolyClaude more popular?
Browser Use has 120,153 GitHub stars and HolyClaude has 2,614. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and HolyClaude free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and HolyClaude under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and HolyClaude?
Browser Use is written in Python and HolyClaude in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or HolyClaude?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,153 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HolyClaude if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.