head to head · open source
Browser Use vs google-play-scraper
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars, 13,383 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. google-play-scraper has 2,997 stars, 723 forks, 117 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 3,905% (120,031 vs 2,997 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; google-play-scraper is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, google-play-scraper 24%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | google-play-scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 3.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 723 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick google-play-scraper if
- You want the google-play-scraper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and google-play-scraper fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About google-play-scraper
google play scraper Node.js module to scrape application data from the Google Play store. ⚠️ I don't use or actively maintain this project anymore, other than reviewing community provided PRs. Expect the parser to break when Google Play's layout changes. Related projects app store scraper: a scraper with a similar interface for the iTunes app store. aso: an App Store Optimization module built on top of this library. google play api: a RESTful API to consume the data produced by this library. Installation Usage Available methods: app: Retrieves the full detail of an application. list: Retrieves a list of…
read the full google-play-scraper overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or google-play-scraper more popular?
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars and google-play-scraper has 2,997. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and google-play-scraper free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and google-play-scraper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and google-play-scraper?
Browser Use is written in Python and google-play-scraper in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or google-play-scraper?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose google-play-scraper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.