head to head · open source
Browser Use vs faster-than-requests
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. faster-than-requests has 1,127 stars, 89 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 10,546% (119,977 vs 1,127 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; faster-than-requests is written in Nim under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, faster-than-requests 8%. faster-than-requests was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | faster-than-requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Nim |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 89 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick faster-than-requests if
- You want the faster-than-requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Nim
- You evaluated both and faster-than-requests fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About faster-than-requests
Faster than Requests Lines Of Code counted using CLOC. Direct dependencies of the package when ready to run. Benchmarks run on Docker from Dockerfile on this repo. Developers counted from the Contributors list of Git. Speed is IRL time to complete 10000 HTTP local requests. Stats as of year 2020. x86 64 64Bit AMD, SSD, Arch Linux. Use Table Of Contents get() Description: Takes an URL string, makes an HTTP GET and returns a dict with the response. Arguments: url the remote URL, string type, required, must not be empty string, example user agent User Agent, string type, optional, should not be empty string. max…
read the full faster-than-requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or faster-than-requests more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and faster-than-requests has 1,127. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and faster-than-requests free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and faster-than-requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and faster-than-requests?
Browser Use is written in Python and faster-than-requests in Nim. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or faster-than-requests?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose faster-than-requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.