head to head · open source
Browser Use vs f-flow
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars, 12,661 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. f-flow has 530 stars, 63 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 21,602% (115,022 vs 530 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | f-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 115K | ★ 530 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 63 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 115K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick f-flow if
- You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.
read the full Browser Use overview →
About f-flow
Foblex Flow The most adopted node editor library for Angular — for production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors. Foblex Flow ships the hard parts of a production node editor — drag logic, hit testing, SVG connection paths, reassign, selection, zoom, and undo/redo — as Angular native building blocks. Begin with f flow , f canvas , nodes, and connections, then add richer editor features only when your product needs them. It powers production products such as Luware Nimbus, ProcessMIX, XpertAI, and EpicStaff. Use it to create workflow builders, AI low code tools, call flow editors, UML…
read the full f-flow overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or f-flow more popular?
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars and f-flow has 530. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and f-flow free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and f-flow?
Browser Use is written in Python and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or f-flow?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (115,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.