head to head · open source
Browser Use vs f-flow
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. f-flow has 541 stars, 66 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 22,055% (119,857 vs 541 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | f-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 541 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 66 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick f-flow if
- You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About f-flow
Foblex Flow The most adopted node editor library for Angular — for production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors. Foblex Flow ships the hard parts of a production node editor — drag logic, hit testing, SVG connection paths, reassign, selection, zoom, and undo/redo — as Angular native building blocks. Begin with f flow , f canvas , nodes, and connections, then add richer editor features only when your product needs them. It powers production products such as Luware Nimbus, ProcessMIX, XpertAI, and EpicStaff. Use it to create workflow builders, AI low code tools, call flow editors…
read the full f-flow overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or f-flow more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and f-flow has 541. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and f-flow free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and f-flow?
Browser Use is written in Python and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or f-flow?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.