head to head · open source
Browser Use vs design-extract
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. design-extract has 4,494 stars, 387 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 2,570% (119,977 vs 4,494 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; design-extract is written in HTML under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, design-extract 9%. design-extract was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | design-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 387 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-extract if
- You want the design-extract feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and design-extract fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About design-extract
Built by Manav Arya Singh ( @Manavarya09 ) Sponsors Atlas Cloud — powers OpenAI compatible smart classification. For AI coding workflows, try the Atlas Cloud coding plan . Bloome — deploys your AI clone to handle every audience conversation, running in the cloud, 24/7. Try designlang on Bloome . designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM. One command emits 17+ files — DTCG tokens, Tailwind config, shadcn theme, Figma variables, motion tokens, typed component anatomy, brand voice, page intent labels, and a paste ready prompt pack for v0 / Lovable / Cursor / Claude…
read the full design-extract overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or design-extract more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and design-extract has 4,494. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and design-extract free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and design-extract under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and design-extract?
Browser Use is written in Python and design-extract in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or design-extract?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose design-extract if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.