head to head · open source
Browser Use vs deepcrawl
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. deepcrawl has 696 stars, 82 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 17,138% (119,977 vs 696 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; deepcrawl is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, deepcrawl 12%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | deepcrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 696 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick deepcrawl if
- You want the deepcrawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and deepcrawl fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About deepcrawl
Deepcrawl WARNING: DO NOT USE DEEPCRAWL IN PRODUCTION RIGHT NOW AS IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND STILL UNDER RAPID DEVELOPMENT. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! 100% free and open source Firecrawl alternative with better performance and flexibility. Ask DeepWiki about this repo NOTE: DeepCrawl doesn’t target anti scraping or anti bot purposes. It’s optimized for high‑frequency agent workloads that scrape public pages to extract cleaned Markdown and a hierarchical links tree. Deepcrawl is an agent oriented website data context extraction platform. It extracts cleaned markdown of page content, agent favoured hierarchical links…
read the full deepcrawl overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or deepcrawl more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and deepcrawl has 696. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and deepcrawl free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and deepcrawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and deepcrawl?
Browser Use is written in Python and deepcrawl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or deepcrawl?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose deepcrawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.