head to head · open source
Browser Use vs curl_cffi
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars, 13,383 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. curl_cffi has 6,814 stars, 573 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,662% (120,031 vs 6,814 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; curl_cffi is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, curl_cffi 8%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | curl_cffi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 6.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 573 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick curl_cffi if
- You want the curl_cffi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and curl_cffi fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About curl_cffi
curl cffi Documentation Python binding for curl impersonate fork via cffi. For commercial support, visit impersonate.pro. curl cffi is the most popular Python binding for curl . Unlike other pure python http clients like httpx or requests , curl cffi can impersonate browsers' TLS/JA3 and HTTP/2 fingerprints. If you are blocked by some website for no obvious reason, you can give curl cffi a try. For JavaScript bindings, see impers, for solving JavaScript challenges, see brimp. Python 3.10 is the minimum supported version since v0.14. Recent highlights 🧭 Our new toy, brimp, a lightweight browser, works like curl…
read the full curl_cffi overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or curl_cffi more popular?
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars and curl_cffi has 6,814. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and curl_cffi free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and curl_cffi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and curl_cffi?
Browser Use is written in Python and curl_cffi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or curl_cffi?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose curl_cffi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.