head to head · open source
Browser Use vs basketball_reference_web_scraper
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars, 13,383 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. basketball_reference_web_scraper has 564 stars, 134 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 21,182% (120,031 vs 564 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; basketball_reference_web_scraper is written in HTML under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, basketball_reference_web_scraper 24%. basketball_reference_web_scraper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | basketball_reference_web_scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 564 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 134 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick basketball_reference_web_scraper if
- You want the basketball_reference_web_scraper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and basketball_reference_web_scraper fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About basketball_reference_web_scraper
Basketball Reference is a great site (especially for a basketball stats nut like me), and hopefully they don't get too pissed off at me for creating this. I initially wrote this library as an exercise for creating my first PyPi package hope you find it valuable! Documentation For documentation about installing the package and API methods see the documentation page. Contributors Thanks to @DaiJunyan, @ecallahan5, @Yotamho, @ntsirakis, @allanbelliti, @krlu, @aaronbannin, @benjaminmesser, @pepeefirat, @PGats, @jakeakopp, and @DigitalCurrensy for their contributions!
read the full basketball_reference_web_scraper overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or basketball_reference_web_scraper more popular?
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars and basketball_reference_web_scraper has 564. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and basketball_reference_web_scraper free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and basketball_reference_web_scraper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and basketball_reference_web_scraper?
Browser Use is written in Python and basketball_reference_web_scraper in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or basketball_reference_web_scraper?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose basketball_reference_web_scraper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.