head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Automa
Browser Use has 119,787 GitHub stars, 13,348 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Automa has 21,705 stars, 2,344 forks, 377 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 452% (119,787 vs 21,705 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Automa is written in Vue under a custom or non-standard licence. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Automa 11%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Automa | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 22K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Vue |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Automa if
- You want the Automa feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Vue
- You evaluated both and Automa fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Automa
Automa An extension for automating your browser by connecting blocks. Auto fill forms, do a repetitive task, take a screenshot, or scrape website data — the choice is yours. You can even schedule when the automation will execute! Downloads Chrome Web Store Firefox Add ons Marketplace Browse the Automa marketplace where you can share and download workflows with others. Go to the marketplace & 187; Automa Chrome Extension Builder Automa Chrome Extension Builder (Automa CEB for short) allows you to generate a standalone chrome extension based on Automa workflows. Go to the documentation & 187; Project setup Before…
read the full Automa overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Automa more popular?
Browser Use has 119,787 GitHub stars and Automa has 21,705. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Automa free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT, and Automa has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Automa?
Browser Use is written in Python and Automa in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Automa?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,787 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Automa if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.