head to head · open source

Browser Use vs atomic-agent

Browser Use has 116,536 GitHub stars, 12,840 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. atomic-agent has 2,514 stars, 252 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped today. Browser Use leads on adoption by 4,535% (116,536 vs 2,514 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; atomic-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, atomic-agent 10%. atomic-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Browser Use ★ 117K atomic-agent ★ 2.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Browser Use atomic-agent
GitHub stars ★ 117K ★ 2.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 252
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Browser Use if

  • You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Browser Use profile →

pick atomic-agent if

  • You want the atomic-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and atomic-agent fits your workflow better

full atomic-agent profile →

About Browser Use

Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.

read the full Browser Use overview →

About atomic-agent

Atomic Agent is a local first AI agent, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, that runs open weight models and its entire control loop on the user's own machine through llama.cpp, aimed at developers and technical users who want a browser driving, file editing, command running assistant without cloud dependency or per token fees.

read the full atomic-agent overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 65K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling browser-use vs scrapy firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee playwright vs crawl4ai playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Browser Use vs Crawl4AI Browser Use vs Scrapling Browser Use vs scrapy Browser Use vs EasySpider Browser Use vs Lightpanda Browser Use vs changedetection.io Browser Use vs CloakBrowser Browser Use vs lux Browser Use vs Scrapegraph-ai Browser Use vs page-agent Browser Use vs ArchiveBox Browser Use vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use or atomic-agent more popular?

Browser Use has 116,536 GitHub stars and atomic-agent has 2,514. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.

Are Browser Use and atomic-agent free?

Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and atomic-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Browser Use and atomic-agent?

Browser Use is written in Python and atomic-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Browser Use or atomic-agent?

Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (116,536 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose atomic-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.