head to head · open source
Browser Use vs atomic-agent
Browser Use has 120,838 GitHub stars, 13,503 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. atomic-agent has 3,631 stars, 294 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 3,228% (120,838 vs 3,631 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; atomic-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, atomic-agent 8%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | atomic-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 121K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 294 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 121K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick atomic-agent if
- You want the atomic-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and atomic-agent fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About atomic-agent
Atomic Agent A local first AI agent that runs on your machine, with local or cloud models. Drives your browser, edits files, runs approved commands, and remembers context across sessions. Open source, running on our TurboQuant llama.cpp so long sessions with small local models fit in less memory. Quick Install · Uninstall · Benchmarks · Why Local First · Ways to Use It · Docs A local first AI agent that runs the control loop and all state on your machine. It works across your machine: browse the web, read and edit files, run approved shell commands, inspect documents, remember context across sessions, schedule…
read the full atomic-agent overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or atomic-agent more popular?
Browser Use has 120,838 GitHub stars and atomic-agent has 3,631. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and atomic-agent free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and atomic-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and atomic-agent?
Browser Use is written in Python and atomic-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or atomic-agent?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,838 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose atomic-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.