head to head · open source
Browser Use vs agentql
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. agentql has 1,494 stars, 181 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 7,931% (119,977 vs 1,494 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; agentql is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, agentql 12%. agentql was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | agentql | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 181 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agentql if
- You want the agentql feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and agentql fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About agentql
AgentQL connects LLMs and AI agents to the entire web What is AgentQL? AgentQL is a suite of tools for extracting data and automating workflows on live web sites featuring an AI powered query language, Python and JavaScript SDKs, a browser based debugger, and a REST API endpoint. It uses natural language queries to pinpoint data and elements on any web page, including authenticated and dynamically generated content. Users can define structured data output and apply transforms within queries. AgentQL's natural language selectors find elements intuitively based on the content of the web page and work across…
read the full agentql overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or agentql more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and agentql has 1,494. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and agentql free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and agentql under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and agentql?
Browser Use is written in Python and agentql in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or agentql?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agentql if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.