head to head · open source
Browser Use vs ActivePieces
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivePieces has 25,343 stars, 4,422 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 373% (119,857 vs 25,343 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ActivePieces 17%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | ActivePieces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 25K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 4.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ActivePieces if
- You want the ActivePieces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ActivePieces fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or ActivePieces more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and ActivePieces has 25,343. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and ActivePieces free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT, and ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Browser Use and ActivePieces?
Browser Use is written in Python and ActivePieces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or ActivePieces?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ActivePieces if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.