head to head · open source

Botpress vs second-brain

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars, 2,293 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped yesterday. second-brain has 643 stars, 77 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped today. Botpress leads on adoption by 2,220% (14,920 vs 643 stars). Botpress is written in TypeScript under MIT; second-brain is written in Python under MIT. Botpress has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, second-brain 12%. second-brain was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Botpress ★ 15K second-brain ★ 643 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Botpress second-brain
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 643
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 77
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Botpress if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Botpress profile →

pick second-brain if

  • You want the second-brain feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and second-brain fits your workflow better

full second-brain profile →

About Botpress

Botpress is open source hub to build and deploy GPT/LLM agents. It lives in Botpress Cloud ecosystem. Project uses TypeScript, MIT license, npm packages @botpress/cli and @botpress/sdk. Repository contains public integrations, devtools, example bots as code, and plugins for Botpress Studio, marked coming soon.

read the full Botpress overview →

About second-brain

Second Brain is an MIT licensed Python agentic framework that turns a machine you control into an assistant with local file intelligence, workflow automation, and LLM driven conversation across a terminal REPL, a web interface, and Telegram, aimed at developers and technical self hosters.

read the full second-brain overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Botpress vs n8n Botpress vs ProxmoxVE Botpress vs ActivePieces Botpress vs LiveKit Botpress vs amis Botpress vs Windmill Botpress vs mitosis Botpress vs Automatisch Botpress vs puck Botpress vs Typebot Botpress vs cadence Botpress vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Botpress or second-brain more popular?

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars and second-brain has 643. Botpress has the larger community by that measure.

Are Botpress and second-brain free?

Both are open source. Botpress is licensed under MIT and second-brain under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Botpress and second-brain?

Botpress is written in TypeScript and second-brain in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Botpress or second-brain?

Choose Botpress if you want the larger community (14,920 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose second-brain if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.