head to head · open source

kit vs bludit

kit has 9,724 GitHub stars, 2,954 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. bludit has 1,466 stars, 334 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. kit leads on adoption by 563% (9,724 vs 1,466 stars). kit is written in HTML under MIT; bludit is written in PHP under MIT. kit has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, bludit 23%. bludit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (blog), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kit ★ 9.7K bludit ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kit bludit
GitHub stars ★ 9.7K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in HTML PHP
Last push 2026-08-04 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 334
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kit if

  • You weight community size — 9.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kit profile →

pick bludit if

  • You want the bludit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and bludit fits your workflow better

full bludit profile →

About kit

HugoBlox (listed in this registry as kit) is a free, MIT licensed static site framework that turns a plain English description into AI generated pages while keeping every page as Markdown you own, built for academics, researchers, developers, and small teams who need professional landing pages, portfolios, blogs, publications, and documentation without a database or a paid site builder.

read the full kit overview →

About bludit

Bludit is flat file CMS. It runs in PHP web hosting ecosystem. It is categorized as Content & Publishing / Blogging & Personal Sites. It functions as blog engine, content management engine, and flat file engine. It is written in PHP and licensed under MIT.

read the full bludit overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

kit vs next.js kit vs nuxt kit vs gatsby kit vs Ghost kit vs jekyll kit vs hexo kit vs nextra kit vs vike kit vs actions-gh-pages kit vs react-snap kit vs hugo-theme-academic-cv kit vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is kit or bludit more popular?

kit has 9,724 GitHub stars and bludit has 1,466. kit has the larger community by that measure.

Are kit and bludit free?

Both are open source. kit is licensed under MIT and bludit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kit and bludit?

kit is written in HTML and bludit in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kit or bludit?

Choose kit if you want the larger community (9,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bludit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.