head to head · open source
Agentic-Bug-Hunter vs lean-ctx
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,380 GitHub stars, 953 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. lean-ctx has 3,890 stars, 353 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agentic-Bug-Hunter leads on adoption by 38% (5,380 vs 3,890 stars). Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT; lean-ctx is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, lean-ctx 9%. lean-ctx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Agentic-Bug-Hunter | lean-ctx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.4K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 953 | ⑂ 353 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You weight community size — 5.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lean-ctx if
- You want the lean-ctx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and lean-ctx fits your workflow better
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
About lean-ctx
██╗ ███████╗ █████╗ ███╗ ██╗ ██████╗████████╗██╗ ██╗ ██║ ██╔════╝██╔══██╗████╗ ██║ ██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝╚██╗██╔╝ ██║ █████╗ ███████║██╔██╗ ██║ ██║ ██║ ╚███╔╝ ██║ ██╔══╝ ██╔══██║██║╚██╗██║ ██║ ██║ ██╔██╗ ███████╗███████╗██║ ██║██║ ╚████║ ╚██████╗ ██║ ██╔╝ ██╗ ╚══════╝╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝╚═╝ ╚═══╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ LeanCTX Context Gateway for AI Systems. Control what your AI can see. LeanCTX sits between AI tools and the information they read. It selects task relevant context, applies supported access and content controls before delivery, and records the context operations and delivery evidence it can observe. Your…
read the full lean-ctx overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agentic-Bug-Hunter or lean-ctx more popular?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,380 GitHub stars and lean-ctx has 3,890. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Agentic-Bug-Hunter and lean-ctx free?
Both are open source. Agentic-Bug-Hunter is licensed under MIT and lean-ctx under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Agentic-Bug-Hunter and lean-ctx?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python and lean-ctx in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Agentic-Bug-Hunter or lean-ctx?
Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if you want the larger community (5,380 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lean-ctx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.