head to head · open source
Avalonia vs qutebrowser
Avalonia has 31,756 GitHub stars, 2,879 forks, 1,875 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. qutebrowser has 11,737 stars, 1,141 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Avalonia leads on adoption by 171% (31,756 vs 11,737 stars). Avalonia is written in C# under MIT; qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Avalonia has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qutebrowser 10%. Avalonia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Avalonia | qutebrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C# | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Avalonia if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qutebrowser if
- You want the qutebrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and qutebrowser fits your workflow better
About Avalonia
📖 About Avalonia is a cross platform UI framework for dotnet, providing a flexible styling system and supporting a wide range of platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android and WebAssembly. Avalonia is mature and production ready and is used by companies, including Schneider Electric, Unity, JetBrains and GitHub. Considered by many to be the spiritual successor to WPF, Avalonia UI provides a familiar, modern development experience for XAML developers creating cross platform applications. While Avalonia UI is similar to WPF, it isn't a 1:1 copy, and you'll find plenty of improvements. For those seeking…
read the full Avalonia overview →
About qutebrowser
// SPDX License Identifier: GPL 3.0 or later // If you are reading this in plaintext or on PyPi: // // A rendered version is available at: // qutebrowser =========== // QUTE WEB HIDE image:qutebrowser/icons/qutebrowser 64x64.png[qutebrowser logo] A keyboard driven, vim like browser based on Python and Qt. image: Status", link=" image: badge",link=" link: link: link: // QUTE WEB HIDE END qutebrowser is a keyboard focused browser with a minimal GUI. It's based on Python and Qt and free software, licensed under the GPL. It was inspired by other browsers/addons like dwb and Vimperator/Pentadactyl. // QUTE WEB HIDE…
read the full qutebrowser overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Avalonia or qutebrowser more popular?
Avalonia has 31,756 GitHub stars and qutebrowser has 11,737. Avalonia has the larger community by that measure.
Are Avalonia and qutebrowser free?
Both are open source. Avalonia is licensed under MIT and qutebrowser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Avalonia and qutebrowser?
Avalonia is written in C# and qutebrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Avalonia or qutebrowser?
Choose Avalonia if you want the larger community (31,756 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qutebrowser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.