head to head · open source

Avalonia vs qutebrowser

Avalonia has 31,530 GitHub stars, 2,825 forks, 1,875 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. qutebrowser has 11,699 stars, 1,130 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Avalonia leads on adoption by 170% (31,530 vs 11,699 stars). Avalonia is written in C# under MIT; qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Avalonia has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qutebrowser 10%. Avalonia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Avalonia ★ 32K qutebrowser ★ 12K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Avalonia qutebrowser
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 12K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Avalonia if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Avalonia profile →

pick qutebrowser if

  • You want the qutebrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and qutebrowser fits your workflow better

full qutebrowser profile →

About Avalonia

Avalonia is a cross platform UI framework for .NET, written in C and driven by XAML. It provides a flexible styling system and targets a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android and WebAssembly. The project is mature and production ready, and it is used by companies such as Schneider Electric, Unity, JetBrains and GitHub. It lives in the .NET ecosystem and is distributed through the NuGet package manager.

read the full Avalonia overview →

About qutebrowser

qutebrowser is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed, keyboard driven browser with a minimal GUI, built on Python and Qt, for people who want vim style keyboard control of the web rather than a mouse.

read the full qutebrowser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Avalonia vs uBlock Avalonia vs Ladybird Avalonia vs chrome-devtools-mcp Avalonia vs monaco-editor Avalonia vs Zen Browser Avalonia vs servo Avalonia vs serenity Avalonia vs refined-github Avalonia vs slate Avalonia vs webtorrent Avalonia vs fingerprintjs Avalonia vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Avalonia or qutebrowser more popular?

Avalonia has 31,530 GitHub stars and qutebrowser has 11,699. Avalonia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Avalonia and qutebrowser free?

Both are open source. Avalonia is licensed under MIT and qutebrowser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Avalonia and qutebrowser?

Avalonia is written in C# and qutebrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Avalonia or qutebrowser?

Choose Avalonia if you want the larger community (31,530 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qutebrowser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.