head to head · open source

Avalonia vs Brave

Avalonia has 31,517 GitHub stars, 2,826 forks, 1,875 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Brave has 23,659 stars, 3,214 forks, 10,752 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Avalonia leads on adoption by 33% (31,517 vs 23,659 stars). Avalonia is written in C# under MIT; Brave is written in various languages under MPL-2.0. Avalonia has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Brave 14%. Brave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Avalonia ★ 32K Brave ★ 24K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Avalonia Brave
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 24K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Avalonia if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Avalonia profile →

pick Brave if

  • You want the Brave feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • You evaluated both and Brave fits your workflow better

full Brave profile →

About Avalonia

Avalonia is a cross platform UI framework for .NET, written in C and driven by XAML. It provides a flexible styling system and targets a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android and WebAssembly. The project is mature and production ready, and it is used by companies such as Schneider Electric, Unity, JetBrains and GitHub. It lives in the .NET ecosystem and is distributed through the NuGet package manager.

read the full Avalonia overview →

About Brave

Brave is a Chromium based web browser for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, released under the MPL 2.0 licence, and this repository is the project's public issue tracker, release channel, and developer wiki rather than the home of its source code.

read the full Brave overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Avalonia vs uBlock Avalonia vs Ladybird Avalonia vs chrome-devtools-mcp Avalonia vs monaco-editor Avalonia vs Zen Browser Avalonia vs servo Avalonia vs serenity Avalonia vs refined-github Avalonia vs slate Avalonia vs webtorrent Avalonia vs fingerprintjs Avalonia vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Avalonia or Brave more popular?

Avalonia has 31,517 GitHub stars and Brave has 23,659. Avalonia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Avalonia and Brave free?

Both are open source. Avalonia is licensed under MIT and Brave under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Avalonia and Brave?

Avalonia is written in C# and Brave in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Avalonia or Brave?

Choose Avalonia if you want the larger community (31,517 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Brave if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.