head to head · open source
vuls vs artex-global
vuls has 12,325 GitHub stars, 1,247 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. artex-global has 2,532 stars, 2,521 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. vuls leads on adoption by 387% (12,325 vs 2,532 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; artex-global is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, artex-global 100%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (cybersecurity, security, security-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vuls | artex-global | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 2.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vuls if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artex-global if
- You want the artex-global feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and artex-global fits your workflow better
About vuls
Vuls: VULnerability Scanner Vulnerability scanner for Linux/FreeBSD, agent less, written in Go. Twitter: @vuls en Abstract For a system administrator, having to perform security vulnerability analysis and software update on a daily basis can be a burden. To avoid downtime in a production environment, it is common for a system administrator to choose not to use the automatic update option provided by the package manager and to perform update manually. This leads to the following problems. The system administrator will have to constantly watch out for any new vulnerabilities in NVD (National Vulnerability…
About artex-global
ARTEX — Global Edition An autonomous penetration testing system driven by LLM multi agents (Go backend + Next.js frontend) The UI and generated output default to English, and can be switched to Korean, Chinese, Spanish or Japanese in Settings (System → Settings → Display language). Changing the language also changes the language of agent generated reports, summaries and chat replies. English · 한국어 · 中文 · Español · 日本語 🚨 Security & misuse warning — read this first This repository is published for use only within authorized environments, and only to build defensive and detection capabilities. ARTEX is an…
read the full artex-global overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vuls or artex-global more popular?
vuls has 12,325 GitHub stars and artex-global has 2,532. vuls has the larger community by that measure.
Are vuls and artex-global free?
Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and artex-global under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vuls and artex-global?
vuls is written in Go and artex-global in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vuls or artex-global?
Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,325 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose artex-global if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.