head to head · open source

Scrapling vs ArchiveBox

Scrapling has 82,668 GitHub stars, 8,422 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ArchiveBox has 28,553 stars, 1,604 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 190% (82,668 vs 28,553 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; ArchiveBox is written in Python under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ArchiveBox 6%. ArchiveBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 83K ArchiveBox ★ 29K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling ArchiveBox
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 29K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick ArchiveBox if

  • You want the ArchiveBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ArchiveBox fits your workflow better

full ArchiveBox profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About ArchiveBox

ArchiveBox is an open source, self hosted web archiving application that lets individuals and organizations preserve public and private web content in durable, readable formats while keeping control of their own data.

read the full ArchiveBox overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Browser Use Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs Lightpanda Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs page-agent Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or ArchiveBox more popular?

Scrapling has 82,668 GitHub stars and ArchiveBox has 28,553. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and ArchiveBox free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ArchiveBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and ArchiveBox?

Scrapling is written in Python and ArchiveBox in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or ArchiveBox?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (82,668 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose ArchiveBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.