head to head · open source

Appwrite vs Woodpecker CI

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars, 5,725 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 7,886 stars, 679 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Appwrite leads on adoption by 628% (57,400 vs 7,886 stars). Appwrite is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Appwrite ★ 57K Woodpecker CI ★ 7.9K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Appwrite Woodpecker CI
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 7.9K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in PHP Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 679
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Appwrite if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Appwrite profile →

pick Woodpecker CI if

  • You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better

full Woodpecker CI profile →

About Appwrite

Appwrite is an open source backend platform that consolidates infrastructure services—authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, hosting, and real time capabilities—into a single, unified system. It runs as a self hosted service or via a managed cloud offering (Appwrite Cloud), targeting developers who want to avoid assembling and maintaining disparate backend tools.

read the full Appwrite overview →

About Woodpecker CI

Woodpecker CI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery engine written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the developer tooling ecosystem around build and deployment automation, and it is distributed as a self hostable server plus one or more agents that execute pipeline work. The project describes itself as a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility, and it is catalogued under topics such as automation, ci, cicd, devops, docker, and kubernetes. Its documentation and plugin directory are hosted at woodpecker ci.org.

read the full Woodpecker CI overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Appwrite vs vite Appwrite vs webpack Appwrite vs parcel Appwrite vs Harness Appwrite vs Dokku Appwrite vs turborepo Appwrite vs nx Appwrite vs NocoBase Appwrite vs gradle Appwrite vs rspack Appwrite vs devbox Appwrite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Appwrite or Woodpecker CI more popular?

Appwrite has 57,400 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 7,886. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.

Are Appwrite and Woodpecker CI free?

Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Appwrite and Woodpecker CI?

Appwrite is written in PHP and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Appwrite or Woodpecker CI?

Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,400 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.