head to head · open source
Appwrite vs Woodpecker CI
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars, 5,830 forks, 1,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 8,097 stars, 734 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Appwrite leads on adoption by 615% (57,854 vs 8,097 stars). Appwrite is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Appwrite has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. Appwrite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Appwrite | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 8.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 734 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Appwrite if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About Appwrite
Appwrite Appwrite is an open source, all in one development platform. Use built in backend infrastructure and web hosting, all from a single place. English 简体中文 Appwrite is an open source development platform for building web, mobile, and AI applications. It brings together backend infrastructure and web hosting in one place, so teams can build, ship, and scale without stitching together a fragmented stack. Appwrite is available as a managed cloud platform and can also be self hosted on infrastructure you control. With Appwrite, you can add authentication, databases, storage, functions, messaging, realtime…
read the full Appwrite overview →
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker Woodpecker is a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility. Installation & Resources Woodpecker can be installed in various ways (see the Installation Instructions) and runs with SQLite as database by default. It requires around 100 MB of RAM (Server) and 30 MB (Agent) at runtime in idle mode. Support You can support the project by becoming a backer on Open Collective or via GitHub Sponsors. Documentation Our documentation can be found at . Translation We have a self hosted Weblate instance at translate.woodpecker ci.org. An overview of the current translation state is available at…
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Appwrite or Woodpecker CI more popular?
Appwrite has 57,854 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 8,097. Appwrite has the larger community by that measure.
Are Appwrite and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. Appwrite is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Appwrite and Woodpecker CI?
Appwrite is written in TypeScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Appwrite or Woodpecker CI?
Choose Appwrite if you want the larger community (57,854 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.