head to head · open source

AppSmith vs Hexabot

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hexabot has 1,227 stars, 242 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. AppSmith leads on adoption by 3,233% (40,894 vs 1,227 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Hexabot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Hexabot 20%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K Hexabot ★ 1.2K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith Hexabot
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 1.2K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 242
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick Hexabot if

  • You want the Hexabot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Hexabot fits your workflow better

full Hexabot profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About Hexabot

Hexabot is a self hosted TypeScript automation platform that builds and runs AI agents and agentic workflows across conversational channels, aimed at developers and teams who want agentic automation running on their own infrastructure rather than on a vendor hosted service.

read the full Hexabot overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs appsmith langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs TipTap AppSmith vs Directus AppSmith vs Budibase AppSmith vs Onlook AppSmith vs Teable AppSmith vs Convex AppSmith vs Alokai AppSmith vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or Hexabot more popular?

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars and Hexabot has 1,227. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and Hexabot free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Hexabot has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between AppSmith and Hexabot?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and Hexabot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or Hexabot?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Hexabot if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.