head to head · open source

AppSmith vs Giselle

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Giselle has 557 stars, 124 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. AppSmith leads on adoption by 7,242% (40,894 vs 557 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Giselle is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Giselle 22%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K Giselle ★ 557 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith Giselle
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 557
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 124
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick Giselle if

  • You want the Giselle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Giselle fits your workflow better

full Giselle profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About Giselle

Giselle is an open source AI app builder for agentic workflows, distributed under the Apache License 2.0 and written primarily in TypeScript. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, built around Next.js, and it describes itself as an AI agent studio that powers product delivery by enabling human AI collaboration. The project is developed in public on GitHub, has a hosted counterpart at giselles.ai, and carries topics such as agent, agent builder, agentic ai, ai agent, multiagent, and generative ai.

read the full Giselle overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs appsmith langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs TipTap AppSmith vs Directus AppSmith vs Budibase AppSmith vs Onlook AppSmith vs Teable AppSmith vs Convex AppSmith vs Alokai AppSmith vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or Giselle more popular?

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars and Giselle has 557. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and Giselle free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Giselle under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and Giselle?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and Giselle in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or Giselle?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Giselle if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.