head to head · open source
papermill vs anymd
papermill has 6,499 GitHub stars, 465 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. anymd has 1,069 stars, 93 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. papermill leads on adoption by 508% (6,499 vs 1,069 stars). papermill is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; anymd is written in Rust under MIT. papermill has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, anymd 9%. anymd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| papermill | anymd | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-05 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 465 | ⑂ 93 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick papermill if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick anymd if
- You want the anymd feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and anymd fits your workflow better
About papermill
papermill is a tool for parameterizing, executing, and analyzing Jupyter Notebooks. Papermill lets you: parameterize notebooks execute notebooks This opens up new opportunities for how notebooks can be used. For example: Perhaps you have a financial report that you wish to run with different values on the first or last day of a month or at the beginning or end of the year, using parameters makes this task easier. Do you want to run a notebook and depending on its results, choose a particular notebook to run next? You can now programmatically execute a workflow without having to copy and paste from notebook to…
read the full papermill overview →
About anymd
anymd PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, EPUB, HTML and web pages, images (OCR), audio and video (metadata, subtitles, transcripts). A fast Rust MCP server and CLI that runs on your machine. No API key. Install · Benchmarks · Tools · CLI · Formats · Docs Formerly pdf reader mcp . Migrating from pdf reader mcp A real, unedited terminal recording (asciinema + agg, script ). The last command is Claude Code answering from the PDF through the anymd MCP server. Why anymd Fast. Native Rust converts in parallel, page by page. On the 19 benchmark documents every tool converted, anymd takes 12.1 s in total; docling 1,723.3 s…
read the full anymd overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is papermill or anymd more popular?
papermill has 6,499 GitHub stars and anymd has 1,069. papermill has the larger community by that measure.
Are papermill and anymd free?
Both are open source. papermill is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and anymd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between papermill and anymd?
papermill is written in Python and anymd in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, papermill or anymd?
Choose papermill if you want the larger community (6,499 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose anymd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.