head to head · open source

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs emba

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,000 GitHub stars, 3,991 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. emba has 3,672 stars, 325 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 799% (33,000 vs 3,672 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; emba is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, emba 9%. emba was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (infosec), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K emba ★ 3.7K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills emba
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.7K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Python Shell
Last push 2026-08-31 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.0K ⑂ 325
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills profile →

pick emba if

  • You want the emba feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and emba fits your workflow better

full emba profile →

About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is an Apache 2.0 Python library of 817 structured cybersecurity skills that gives AI agents the working knowledge of a senior security analyst, aimed at security teams, DevSecOps engineers, and red or blue teams that already run agents such as Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, or Gemini CLI.

read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →

About emba

EMBA is the open source security analyzer for firmware of embedded devices, a Shell based command line tool that carries penetration testers, product security teams, developers and product managers from firmware extraction through static analysis, emulation based dynamic analysis and SBOM creation to a web based vulnerability report.

read the full emba overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs PayloadsAllTheThings Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs ProjectDiscovery Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs pentagi Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs PentestGPT Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Osintgram Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs vuls Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs osv-scanner Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Nettacker Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs afrog Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Raccoon Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Tracecat

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or emba more popular?

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,000 GitHub stars and emba has 3,672. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.

Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and emba free?

Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and emba under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and emba?

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and emba in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or emba?

Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (33,000 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose emba if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.