head to head · open source

amis vs magic

amis has 18,894 GitHub stars, 2,736 forks, 1,715 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. magic has 1,192 stars, 176 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. amis leads on adoption by 1,485% (18,894 vs 1,192 stars). amis is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; magic is written in C# under MIT. amis has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. magic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (low-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

amis ★ 19K magic ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

amis magic
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick amis if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full amis profile →

pick magic if

  • You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better

full magic profile →

About amis

amis is an Apache 2.0 licensed front end low code framework from Baidu that generates admin and back office pages from JSON configuration, aimed at teams that want such interfaces without writing front end code by hand.

read the full amis overview →

About magic

Magic is an MIT licensed low code platform and MCP server, written in C for .NET 10, that turns plain English into a working full stack application — database, secure API, business logic and frontend — running on your own hardware with no vendor lock in.

read the full magic overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

amis vs n8n amis vs ProxmoxVE amis vs ActivePieces amis vs LiveKit amis vs Windmill amis vs Botpress amis vs mitosis amis vs Automatisch amis vs puck amis vs Typebot amis vs cadence amis vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is amis or magic more popular?

amis has 18,894 GitHub stars and magic has 1,192. amis has the larger community by that measure.

Are amis and magic free?

Both are open source. amis is licensed under Apache-2.0 and magic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between amis and magic?

amis is written in TypeScript and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, amis or magic?

Choose amis if you want the larger community (18,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.