head to head · open source

akto vs coi

akto has 1,522 GitHub stars, 294 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. coi has 732 stars, 64 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. akto leads on adoption by 108% (1,522 vs 732 stars). akto is written in Java under MIT; coi is written in Go under MIT. akto has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, coi 9%. akto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

akto ★ 1.5K coi ★ 732 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

akto coi
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 732
License MIT MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 294 ⑂ 64
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick akto if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full akto profile →

pick coi if

  • You want the coi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coi fits your workflow better

full coi profile →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

About coi

Coi (Code on Incus) is an MIT licensed Go tool that gives each AI coding agent its own isolated Incus system container — a full Linux machine with root, systemd, and Docker — for developers who want agents to work like they would on a real server without exposing the host or its credentials.

read the full coi overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 391K Hermes Agent ★ 250K Ollama ★ 182K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K ponytail ★ 149K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

akto vs strix akto vs shannon akto vs SkillSpector akto vs iFixAi akto vs codex-security akto vs garak akto vs AI-Infra-Guard akto vs giskard-oss akto vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter akto vs nono akto vs CyberStrike akto vs AiSOC

Frequently asked questions

Is akto or coi more popular?

akto has 1,522 GitHub stars and coi has 732. akto has the larger community by that measure.

Are akto and coi free?

Both are open source. akto is licensed under MIT and coi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between akto and coi?

akto is written in Java and coi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, akto or coi?

Choose akto if you want the larger community (1,522 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose coi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.