head to head · open source
akto vs code-on-incus
akto has 1,518 GitHub stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-on-incus has 726 stars, 63 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. akto leads on adoption by 109% (1,518 vs 726 stars). akto is written in Java under MIT; code-on-incus is written in Go under MIT. akto has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, code-on-incus 9%. code-on-incus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| akto | code-on-incus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.5K | ★ 726 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 292 | ⑂ 63 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick akto if
- You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-on-incus if
- You want the code-on-incus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and code-on-incus fits your workflow better
About akto
Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.
About code-on-incus
code on incus (coi) is an MIT licensed Go tool that runs AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, and omp inside their own isolated Incus system containers — full Linux machines with root, systemd, and Docker — and adds kernel level active defense that pauses or kills the container when it detects dangerous behavior, for developers who need real machine access without exposing the host or their credentials.
read the full code-on-incus overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is akto or code-on-incus more popular?
akto has 1,518 GitHub stars and code-on-incus has 726. akto has the larger community by that measure.
Are akto and code-on-incus free?
Both are open source. akto is licensed under MIT and code-on-incus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between akto and code-on-incus?
akto is written in Java and code-on-incus in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, akto or code-on-incus?
Choose akto if you want the larger community (1,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-on-incus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.