head to head · open source
reconftw vs airgorah
reconftw has 8,138 GitHub stars, 1,235 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. airgorah has 3,572 stars, 605 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. reconftw leads on adoption by 128% (8,138 vs 3,572 stars). reconftw is written in Shell under MIT; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. reconftw has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. reconftw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| reconftw | airgorah | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.1K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Shell | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 605 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick reconftw if
- You weight community size — 8.1K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick airgorah if
- You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better
About reconftw
reconFTW is an automated reconnaissance framework, written in Shell under the MIT licence, that runs a curated chain of security tools against a target domain to enumerate subdomains and hosts, gather OSINT, analyse web surfaces, and check for vulnerabilities; it is built for security researchers, penetration testers, and bug bounty hunters.
read the full reconftw overview →
About airgorah
Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.
read the full airgorah overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is reconftw or airgorah more popular?
reconftw has 8,138 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,572. reconftw has the larger community by that measure.
Are reconftw and airgorah free?
Both are open source. reconftw is licensed under MIT and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between reconftw and airgorah?
reconftw is written in Shell and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, reconftw or airgorah?
Choose reconftw if you want the larger community (8,138 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.