head to head · open source

Raccoon vs airgorah

Raccoon has 4,027 GitHub stars, 501 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. airgorah has 3,536 stars, 595 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Raccoon leads on adoption by 14% (4,027 vs 3,536 stars). Raccoon is written in Python under MIT; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. Raccoon has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. airgorah was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Raccoon ★ 4.0K airgorah ★ 3.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Raccoon airgorah
GitHub stars ★ 4.0K ★ 3.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-04-21 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 501 ⑂ 595
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Raccoon if

  • You weight community size — 4.0K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Raccoon profile →

pick airgorah if

  • You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better

full airgorah profile →

About Raccoon

Raccoon is an open source, MIT licensed offensive security tool written in Python for reconnaissance and information gathering, built for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security analysts who need to map a target's DNS, TLS, network, and web footprint from a single command line.

read the full Raccoon overview →

About airgorah

Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.

read the full airgorah overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Raccoon vs PayloadsAllTheThings Raccoon vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills Raccoon vs ProjectDiscovery Raccoon vs pentagi Raccoon vs PentestGPT Raccoon vs Osintgram Raccoon vs vuls Raccoon vs osv-scanner Raccoon vs Nettacker Raccoon vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool Raccoon vs afrog Raccoon vs Tracecat

Frequently asked questions

Is Raccoon or airgorah more popular?

Raccoon has 4,027 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,536. Raccoon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Raccoon and airgorah free?

Both are open source. Raccoon is licensed under MIT and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Raccoon and airgorah?

Raccoon is written in Python and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Raccoon or airgorah?

Choose Raccoon if you want the larger community (4,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.