head to head · open source

AI-Infra-Guard vs CyberStrike

AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373 GitHub stars, 733 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CyberStrike has 3,374 stars, 583 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. AI-Infra-Guard leads on adoption by 119% (7,373 vs 3,374 stars). AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0; CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. AI-Infra-Guard has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CyberStrike 17%. AI-Infra-Guard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AI-Infra-Guard ★ 7.4K CyberStrike ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AI-Infra-Guard CyberStrike
GitHub stars ★ 7.4K ★ 3.4K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 733 ⑂ 583
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AI-Infra-Guard if

  • You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AI-Infra-Guard profile →

pick CyberStrike if

  • You want the CyberStrike feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and CyberStrike fits your workflow better

full CyberStrike profile →

About AI-Infra-Guard

📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan,AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…

read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →

About CyberStrike

English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…

read the full CyberStrike overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is AI-Infra-Guard or CyberStrike more popular?

AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373 GitHub stars and CyberStrike has 3,374. AI-Infra-Guard has the larger community by that measure.

Are AI-Infra-Guard and CyberStrike free?

Both are open source. AI-Infra-Guard is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CyberStrike under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AI-Infra-Guard and CyberStrike?

AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python and CyberStrike in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AI-Infra-Guard or CyberStrike?

Choose AI-Infra-Guard if you want the larger community (7,373 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CyberStrike if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.