head to head · open source

AI-Infra-Guard vs ARTEX

AI-Infra-Guard has 6,923 GitHub stars, 669 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ARTEX has 1,485 stars, 712 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. AI-Infra-Guard leads on adoption by 366% (6,923 vs 1,485 stars). AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0; ARTEX is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. AI-Infra-Guard has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ARTEX 48%. AI-Infra-Guard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AI-Infra-Guard ★ 6.9K ARTEX ★ 1.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AI-Infra-Guard ARTEX
GitHub stars ★ 6.9K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-10-21 2026-10-19
Forks ⑂ 669 ⑂ 712
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AI-Infra-Guard if

  • You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AI-Infra-Guard profile →

pick ARTEX if

  • You want the ARTEX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ARTEX fits your workflow better

full ARTEX profile →

About AI-Infra-Guard

📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan,AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…

read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →

About ARTEX

ARTEX AI autonomous penetration testing system. Multi agent LLM, Go backend, Next.js frontend. AI 自主渗透测试系统(Go 后端 + Next.js 前端)。 ARTEX is a multi agent system for autonomous penetration testing in an isolated lab: a planner and workers share an asset graph and an exploration graph, with human in the loop approval and full traffic recording. It ships as one binary or a Docker Compose stack. 截图预览 审批记录详情 全局「审批记录」、任务内「拦截审批」及对话中的审批卡片均支持展开查看详情。展示结构参考 AegisHook 的审批详情组件,沿用 ARTEX 的组件和主题: 资产同步(ScopeSentry) 支持从 ScopeSentry 直接同步资产数据,免去重复收集: 在「 资产同步 」页填 ScopeSentry 的地址与 API Key,接入数据源; 按 项目 或 任务 维度选择要同步的目标与资产类型(域名 / 子域 / IP /…

read the full ARTEX overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is AI-Infra-Guard or ARTEX more popular?

AI-Infra-Guard has 6,923 GitHub stars and ARTEX has 1,485. AI-Infra-Guard has the larger community by that measure.

Are AI-Infra-Guard and ARTEX free?

Both are open source. AI-Infra-Guard is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ARTEX under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AI-Infra-Guard and ARTEX?

AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python and ARTEX in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AI-Infra-Guard or ARTEX?

Choose AI-Infra-Guard if you want the larger community (6,923 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ARTEX if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.